YouTube No Translation

(addons.mozilla.org)

115 points | by doener 1 day ago

19 comments

  • rdtsc 2 hours ago
    It's surprising how hostile youtube is to multilingual users. Probably all in some attempt to show off their translation capability or to improve the experience for users who may want to access content in a language they don't speak? Or it's just as dumb as this was on some product managers "designed and implemented" line to get promoted?

    But, surely someone sane there has to realize there is a large number of users out there who speak more than one language, and don't need Google do "help" them or "guess" for what language they like more.

    • phantomathkg 1 hour ago
      i18n and l10n are something that I have seen a company done right. It is easy developer to assume:

      If your IP is coming from country X, you must want the content to be served in language X.

      No, there are tourist from country Z, long term resident who prefer language A and people from country X want to learn language B.

      - If your browser Accept-Language say X,Y, then you must want all the content to be served in X.

      No, I want my search result to be predominantly in X, but when I search for things about Y, show me language Y, and when I search for this band from country Z, please show me in language X.

      As a hongkonger (zh_hk + en_gb), living in Singapore (zh_cn + en?), following JPOP. This is the daily fight I have with browser.

      I would rather all application, including web app just give me the option to choose and say, interface language, english, content language, follow origin.

      • littlecranky67 16 minutes ago
        No need to do these assumptions, youtube accounts are google accounts and google already supports setting multiple languages that you speak/read.
        • kikokikokiko 4 minutes ago
          It doesn't work, you can set all the languages you speak on your Google account settings, and Youtube will still change every video title and audio track to either your default language on settings, or your system language. At this point I don't even know what stupid decision between the two above the Youtube backend is choosing.
      • rtpg 1 hour ago
        > i18n and l10n are something that I have seen a company done right. It is easy developer to assume:

        > If your IP is coming from country X, you must want the content to be served in language X.

        I would assume there are multilingual speakers in mostly every single team at YouTube. Or at the very least enough nerds who just like some random content from another country.

        People who would both want their UI to be in a language A but also to consume content from languages B, C...

        I do not understand how that assumption holds in any product decision except in one where the YT product teams are entirely and totally separated from the engineering teams.

      • creakingstairs 1 hour ago
        > As a hongkonger (zh_hk + en_gb), living in Singapore (zh_cn + en?), following JPOP. This is the daily fight I have with browser.

        Ah yes as a Korean living in Japan with locale set to English, this truly is a daily fight.

        > I would rather all application, including web app just give me the option to choose

        I've left websites for other competitors because they wouldn't have a button to change language.

    • saretup 1 hour ago
      Doesn’t it just use the primary language you select in your account settings? Unless you’re talking about using it in incognito, in which case it does get annoying when it assumes a language based on region without asking.
      • RJIb8RBYxzAMX9u 12 minutes ago
        My configured primary language is English, but I regularly watch contents in Chinese and Japanese, where I have sufficient mastery over to not need YouTube's subpar translation. YouTube's insistence in displaying video titles in English, starting a few months ago, and now also auto-dubbing in English, is incredibly annoying.
    • hnthrowaway_423 2 hours ago
      Right ? I am suprised that Facebook is actually the one leading in this UX: they clearly separate UX language ( singular ) and Languages which you don't need translation ( plural ).
      • nextaccountic 1 hour ago
        I really, really want to have a way to tell Youtube that if I enable subtitles and the content is either English or Portuguese, then the subtitles should be shown in the original language (either subtitles created by the author or auto-generated subtitles - sometimes I can't do audio), but if it's another language, it should be shown in English (again, either subtitles authored by a person, or auto-generated ones)

        This extension can control subtitles so maybe there is hope that this or another extension will offer this kind of fine granularity

        • Kwpolska 58 minutes ago
          This used to work some time ago. They just didn't automatically enable translation and picked the default language.
    • pyrale 1 hour ago
      The worst part about it is the half-translated effect on many sites. I'm fine in my native language and in english, but having a page written in both is a purge. Add to this the disappearance of a way to select language quiclky and the web is becoming shit these days wrt i18n.
    • pyuser583 1 hour ago
      There are some very complicated legal issues that come up with international video.

      Movie companies sometimes don’t want things distributed on certain areas - ever. Like when there are different productions of the same movie for different areas.

      The productions would compete against each other.

      It’s one of the reasons DVD has multiple incompatible regions.

      I don’t know if this is YouTube’s reasoning.

      • bcoates 1 hour ago
        If I remember right YouTube already provides the tools for that and you can just outright region lock an upload (possibly depending on having the right creator bits as a studio/large channel)
        • bl4ckneon 1 hour ago
          Yes, for CMS channels, which would be your movie studios, TV studios, etc. They have an option to block certain countries from watching it. If you are around in YouTube often enough you will find a video or two that will say something like "this video isn't available in your region/country"
      • numpad0 1 hour ago
        No, the complaint is opposite of that. They're seeking ways to escape their translation efforts because it's so bad.

        It has nothing to do with difficulties of offering translations. It's about declining complimentary ketchup squeeze on latte.

  • goku12 3 hours ago
    Kudos to YouTube for making it to the list of a rare few websites that require browser extensions to deliver a half decent user experience. What's more? YouTube also leaves the competition in the dust in the sheer number of extensions required to achieve this. I hear that you extend this privilege uniformly to both unpaid guests and the subscribers of YouTube Premium alike. I'm sure that the lack of alternatives helped you a lot in achieving this coveted status.
    • userbinator 1 hour ago
      I stopped using the site long ago because of what it's turned into, and only visit it for the occasional things I can't do with Invidious, yt-dlp, and a few shell scripts.

      It's quite telling of how their developers "think" when they put the original language stream as the last one in the track list, instead of the sane first (zeroth?) position that it should occupy.

  • littlecranky67 17 minutes ago
    Youtube translations is such a dumb feature. I watch in german and english and have my language set to english. The english translations for german titles are most of the time garbage, because they translate names and fixed expressions we keep in english all to german. The result is just utter garbage - an complegtely unwanted. Especially since the underlying google account does support multiple languages, and I have set both languages that I speak there.
  • lajosbacs 25 minutes ago
    It is insane to me that you cannot turn it off in the setting even as a premium user. Or better yet, make this opt-in for everyone.

    I live in a German speaking country, yet my native language is other and German is almost never preferred when I watch some content. All my UIs are in English.

    Yet, I open a video by a Brit and he is autodubbed to German. There really isn't any similar UX decision by any other reputed company that would be comparably stupid as this. Google even has large presence in Switzerland, that makes it even more puzzling.

    • atoav 21 minutes ago
      German is my first language, but I prefer consuming English content in its original language.

      The thing with youtube translated titles is that half of them aren't even propper German and half of that half is utterly nonsensical, because some English ideom has been translated too literally.

  • tobi_bsf 59 minutes ago
    It’s unbelievable how broken YouTube is when it comes to language. I’m German. I want to see German content in German, and obviously I want to see English content in English. How is this not possible—especially when it worked perfectly for years? Is there a Chrome Variant of this?
    • RamRodification 51 minutes ago
      If you use Chrome, you are at the whim of the same people who are messing up the platform in the first place anyway. You should probably see if you can transition to Firefox or some other non-Chromium browser.
  • chartered_stack 1 hour ago
    I actually appreciate the YouTube's auto-translate feature a lot because it allows me to search through videos in languages I don't know but still like to view videos and listen to videos in. For example, I listen to a lot of city pop and anime title songs on YouTube and a lot of them have titles in Japanese only. I absolutely would not find it as easy as I do to search through this content and listen to the music if the auto-translation feature did not exist. It just makes it easier for people who don't know the language to view videos in that language. Sure the translation quality might not be the best but it makes search a whole lot easier. This is why I find some of the comments on this thread surprising.

    Having said that I am against the automatic audio translation that some people are reporting. I have not experienced it myself but that seems poorly thought out. It should be easier for people to search through items in a foreign language but that content should be served in the content originally intended.

    • rtpg 1 hour ago
      I do not understand how this got rolled out. Surely there are _loads_ of multilingual people working at YouTube. How is there not at least an option to flag multiple languages that you speak?

      At least the audio translation I can turn off. I do not know how to get the actual title of a video or its description.

      It's so frustrating that I've ended up just changing my UI language from English to another language so that at least those don't get butchered.

      • stoltzmann 14 minutes ago
        >I do not understand how this got rolled out. Surely there are _loads_ of multilingual people working at YouTube.

        Simple - at Google, feedback from internal users is ignored.

      • charcircuit 53 minutes ago
        It got rolled out due to how MASSIVE the bounce rate is if the video is in a language users don't understand. I can easily see this on average providing a better experience and lead to less people bouncing. The false positives are not enough to counteract it.
        • rtpg 51 minutes ago
          Just feels relatively easy to change the language preference to be a multiselect though.... like ignoring user backlash, I'd assume _internal users of YT_ would just get extremely annoyed.

          I don't really need magic, mainly want "if language not user's language" to turn into "if language not in user's language(s)"

    • eCa 55 minutes ago
      > This is why I find some of the comments on this thread surprising.

      Two words: Preference and choice. You prefer it one way and are happy. Other prefer it another way.

      The fact that they are unhappy is not that you can do what makes you happy. It is that the choice isn’t easily available to choose to do what makes them happy.

    • supriyo-biswas 1 hour ago
      > This is why I find some of the comments on this thread surprising.

      In general, some of the loudest voices in any given community are the ones who are dissatisfied with the thing in question. So, there are many people (or at least the two of us!) who are reasonably satisfied with this feature and find it helpful.

  • oc1 2 hours ago
    So Google assumes that its user only speaks one language and needs translation for everything else. Is this the educational standard in America?
    • kalleboo 1 hour ago
      What's crazy is the US actually does have a decent proportion of multilingual speakers thanks to its history of immigration (a quick search reveals 20% of American residents are bilingual). Even Google staff should be a pretty multicultural bunch of people as they recruit globally.
      • simongray 1 hour ago
        I mean... 20% is not really a lot. It's probably a lot closer to 100% in most countries of the world.
  • felindev 27 minutes ago
    This change has really been annoying me and as far as I tested, no extension worked. Quick look through network activity and it confirmed that it was done server side, no original titles were supplied anywhere. Only option was display language and titles were pre-translated to it. Just give me option to see original content, that is why I'm here
    • RJIb8RBYxzAMX9u 4 minutes ago
      I've just installed this extension, and confirmed that -- at least for now -- it works. The translated tiles will be flashed first, then replaced by the original title.
  • tilsammans 59 minutes ago
    I can recommend the DeArrow extension for this. It has an option to always show the untranslated title. Plus, it has the intended features such as thumbnail replacement and crowd-sourced titles. DeArrow works in Android Firefox.

    It's unfortunate that YouTube is only usable with these extensions, but here we are.

  • oc1 1 hour ago
    Reddit is the worst offender. I really wonder what goes through the mind of the management clerks at these companies.
    • felindev 23 minutes ago
      While it is annoying, reddit at lest gives you option to see original text.
    • userbinator 1 hour ago
      I really wonder what goes through the mind of the management clerks at these companies.

      "More $$$!!1"

      • 0wis 1 hour ago
        Yeah, short term. Because power users that are used to switch between languages using internet slang do not like half baked polished translation in their IP-location language. So they leave. Remain mainly low quality users who couldn’t or didn’t wanted to switch between languages. A more powerful forever September again.
  • heisenbit 22 minutes ago
    I‘ve seen YT randomly deciding to translate videos shown in the the Telegram iOS client. No way around it other than view it on YT directly.
  • renegat0x0 16 minutes ago
    Unfortunately the extensions are not available for android....
    • littlecranky67 15 minutes ago
      Extensions are in general not available for Android (or at least chrome for android)?
  • vhcr 1 hour ago
    Google is the worst when it comes to i18n, I speak both Spanish and English, it translates reviews automatically to English, but at the same time will show me content in Spanish when I searched for something in English.
  • seydor 1 hour ago
    i dont mind the others, but the automatic audio switch is very offensive to the creators
  • doener 1 day ago
  • Jcampuzano2 2 hours ago
    I feel like its profoundly American to assume everyone wants to see everything in one language.

    I regularly consume content in two languages, my partner 3, and many of my friends are in the same boat. Please either allow me to just blacklist languages to not translate automatically or always keep content in the original language but allow changing after engaging with it. Its insane that this requires an extension for a company with as much resources as google.

    The translations of video titles are absolutely atrocious and rarely mean anything near the intent of the original title.

  • Xunjin 1 hour ago
    Thank you!
  • ars 3 hours ago
    Why would I want this? I watched a translated YouTube video and it was great.

    If I don't want the translated sound track there's a button right there in settings to change it. Why do I need this extension?

    • Tomte 2 hours ago
      I‘m German, watching a German creator in a German-language recording.

      Only that YouTube decides to use their Mickey Mouse sounding AI voice to deliver an English audio track. Not every time, but at least a third of the time. I have to hunt for the audio setting each time, because you cannot turn off AI voices permanently.

      Tell me again how I‘m wrong.

      • weinzierl 2 hours ago
        I only love it when their Mickey Mouse sounding AI voice turns ads into a real clown show.

        Imagine how they spent big money developing a slogan for their brand or product and then AI comes around with a near literal translation that makes no sense whatsoever and that is what people hear.

        That is the only positive side, otherwise it is what you wrote. A real pain.

    • sebtron 2 hours ago
      Automatically translated titles are often just wrong and misleading, and there is no way to turn this "feature" off.

      If you understand more than one language, you'll get half of the videos sloppily translated for no reason. There is no way to tell YouTube not to do this for specific languages.

      It is beyond annoying.

    • vcvbcv 2 hours ago
      I guess this extension is really aimed at multilingual viewers who don’t want English (or any language they already know) automatically translated into their native tongue.

      A better solution would be a ‘blacklist’ of languages you understand—so YouTube only auto‑translates from languages you don’t speak, and always leaves familiar languages in their original form.

      • Tomte 2 hours ago
        > who don’t want English (or any language they already know) automatically translated into their native tongue.

        It‘s even the other way around!

    • seszett 2 hours ago
      I don't know, maybe I didn't look hard enough but the last time it happened to me I couldn't find a way to hear the original.

      It was a video in French over accents, so the automatic English translation kind of made it useless. I'm French anyway, why translate it to English? I don't even live in an English-speaking country either (not that translating to Dutch would have been better).

    • hnthrowaway_423 1 hour ago
      >People make free things for other people who need it

      >"Why would I want this?"

    • cortesoft 2 hours ago
      Some people speak multiple languages, and don't need every video not in their language translated.
    • numpad0 1 hour ago
      Because displaced honorifics alone is too much. Translated audio railroads is match was a draw. worse.
    • charcircuit 3 hours ago
      For example if you listen to music in a different language you may be familiar with the foriegn name of a song, but not the translation of it. This makes things confusing.

      Also for the sound track sometimes there isn't even an option to disable it depending on what experiment or client you are using.