Framework Raises DDR5 Memory Prices by 50% for DIY Laptops

(phoronix.com)

99 points | by mikece 2 hours ago

18 comments

  • walterbell 2 hours ago
    https://www.trendforce.com/news/2025/12/05/exclusive-memory-...

    > Lenovo has begun notifying clients of coming price hikes, with adjustments set to take effect in early 2026.. Dell is expected to raise prices by at least 15-20%, with the increase potentially taking effect as soon as mid-December.. Dell COO Jeff Clarke warned that he’s “never seen memory-chip costs rise this fast,” .. Lenovo [cited] two key factors: an intensifying memory shortage and the rapid integration of AI technologies.. TrendForce has downgraded its 2026 notebook shipment forecast from an initial 1.7% YoY growth to a 2.4% YoY decline.

    https://hanchouhsu.substack.com/p/overview-of-the-memory-mar...

    > The full-year price increase for Samsung’s storage products supplied to Apple in 2026 has been finalized, with DRAM prices rising by 53% and NAND prices rising by 52%. Earlier rumors suggesting an 80% full-year increase for DRAM were inaccurate.. Apple negotiated the prices down to the aforementioned levels and signed long-term agreements (LTAs).. Kioxia also signed a similar agreement with Apple, with price increases consistent with Samsung’s.

    • ndiddy 1 hour ago
      Dell now charges more for RAM than Apple for some models: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/apple-now-beats-dell-at...
      • Bayart 11 minutes ago
        The margins on memory for Apple were so absurd that they should have more ability to eat up the costs, if they wanted to. I'm assuming they would, to the extent that they're a device company more so than a service company yet.
  • acephal 56 minutes ago
    Altman should be jailed for this. Single-handedly crashing consumer spending in an entire sector of the economy. At the very least for the reason that that was supposed to happen _after_ they had the AI in hand to supplant majority white collar labor, not before.
    • bdcravens 1 minute ago
      Wouldn't we have done the same to those who impacted video card prices in years past? (Gaming company execs, cryptocurrency developers, etc)
    • derektank 10 minutes ago
      We’re contemplating jailing people for buying manufactured goods at the market price now?
      • stackskipton 5 minutes ago
        Yes? Reports are that OpenAI is buying unfinished memory kits which they have no capacity to complete. It appears that OpenAI is just buying them to remove them from the market and damage their competitors. In United States, that used to be considered against the law if we were actually enforcing such things.
      • Dylan16807 0 minutes ago
        Didn't they sign some big contacts to lock in non-market prices?
    • cyanydeez 32 minutes ago
      He's just one of the ringleaders of the AI parade. This certainly isn'tjust him, just like the american corruption isn't just donald trump
  • arjie 8 minutes ago
    I bought a couple of terabytes of RAM and now I feel like one of those crypto-whales haha. It's just sitting there in the corner. One was a lucky one, too, because I tried to negotiate a guy to sell me a system with less RAM but he wouldn't discount it much. Now it pays for most of the cost of the damn thing.

    These spikes do happen. I remember one for hard drives after a storm. The surprising thing for me is how cheap a super-powerful Epyc is these days. But then you need to fill the 12 RAM slots and that becomes more costly. Funny times.

  • Neywiny 2 hours ago
    I have 96GB of 6000 MT/s. Pcpartpicker says 64GB kits have quadrupled in price since August. So I'm almost surprised it's only 50%.
    • mananaysiempre 1 hour ago
      A year ago, Framework-branded memory for DIY laptops cost, IIRC, 2x Amazon for equivalent specs (not the same modules—the ADATA ones that Framework puts their stickers on are theoretically available retail but in practice complete unobtanium in most countries). Not Apple pricing, but they definitely have some margin to eat into.
    • jimmaswell 34 minutes ago
      I feel like I got the last chopper out of 'nam buying my G.Skill 256GB 6000MT/s kit when I did. I paid $780 in July and now it's listed at.. $2700, over 300% higher. That and buying a bunch of sticks for some Tyan boards I got on a whim last year with some engineering samples I got working on them.
    • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
      Literally bought 96GB (4x24GB) of DDR5 5600Mhz (edit: RDIMM ECC) just 5 days ago, fearing the prices would go up even more moving forward. Paid 1500 EUR for it in total :/ Southern Europe FWIW.
      • kachapopopow 43 minutes ago
        I think you got scammed by a local vendor, I got ddr5 2x48gb in europe 6400mhz (non ecc) for 320ish euro.
        • embedding-shape 42 minutes ago
          It's RDIMM ECC DDR5, for a sTR5 system, guess that's why the price difference. Should have mentioned that, my bad.
  • fcoury 1 hour ago
    I thought Apple would get around and improve their memory prices with time, I guess it's the opposite: all manufacturers are now becoming Apple given these raises.

    I wonder what Apple's next move will be :-)

    EDIT: Spelling

    • echelon 1 hour ago
      They are not becoming Apple. They are updating the prices of their components to the underlying market costs. Framework lets you replace the memory modules.

      Apple is a fashionable brand that commands a price premium. They can charge much higher prices and will charge the amount that will maximize their profits.

      BMW charges to enable heated seats. They know their customers have money and will pay. Apple is the same.

      Framework has to competitively price. They're being forced to update pricing to reflect the reality of supply and demand.

      There's also this:

      > Due to [Framework's] memory pricing said to be more competitive below market rates, they also adjusted their return policy to prevent scalpers from purchasing DIY Edition laptops with memory while then returning just the laptops. The DDR5 must be returned now with DIY laptop order returns.

      • kjkjadksj 8 minutes ago
        Have you seen laptop prices these days? Macbooks aren’t even sold at a premium anymore.
  • SlightlyLeftPad 2 hours ago
    Yikes, I hadn’t realized this was that big of a problem. The same exact G.skill z5 64Gb ram I bought 4 years ago is well on its way to being double the price. Does this have more to do with Crucial ending consumer product lines or tariffs?
    • adastra22 2 hours ago
      It is because OpenAI bought 40% of the world’s production capacity overnight. RAM is like toilet paper during Covid now.
      • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
        And also because Korean companies apparently fear US retribution if they start producing DDR4. I don't feel like "OpenAI bought half the supply" tells the entire story when the companies that used to produce DDR4 with the left over machines no longer dare to do so. Probably the prices wouldn't spike as they're doing right now if the ones who used to produce the older RAM generations actually continued doing so.
      • prmoustache 1 hour ago
        The toilet paper thing didn't really happen though because there is so much shit people can produce at a time and the demand never increased if you scaled it to a 2 weeks period. There was enough stock in warehouses that 3 days later every store had a full stock again and the prices never increased.
        • adastra22 53 minutes ago
          Did we live through the same pandemic? At least where I live, there was shortages for weeks, and scarce for months.

          There was a real manufacturing shift that had to happen in the transition from commercial toilet paper to residential, which is made by totally different machines. The problem was real. It’s just that someone, seeing that real problem, triggered a panic buy that resulted in cleared shelves and a misallocation of the actual supply, making everything worse for everyone.

          In the present case, OpenAI just took 40% of the world’s supply off the market. That is massive, and will have implications for RAM availability for many industries. As a result, every other company immediately bought up as much supply as they could.

          Cars during Covid is probably the closer comparison, actually. A combined supply-drop followed by demand-shock resulting in skyrocketing prices and empty inventory.

        • bigstrat2003 39 minutes ago
          > The toilet paper thing didn't really happen though

          It absolutely happened. I was there, I saw it happen. Maybe it didn't happen in your area, but others weren't so lucky.

        • dragonwriter 30 minutes ago
          > The toilet paper thing didn't really happen [...]

          Yes, it did.

          > [...] because there is so much shit people can produce at a time and the demand never increased if you scaled it to a 2 weeks period. There was enough stock in warehouses that 3 days later every store had a full stock again and the prices never increased.

          No, there wasn't in lots of places, and demand for the kind of toilet paper that fits on home dispensers did increase (and demand for the kind of big rolls used exclusively in institutional settings decreased, and shifting between those two for manufacturing is not quick), and there were extended supply issues in many places. (This was certainly true where I lived, but I would expect it had lots of regional variance, because supply chains are regional, the share of workers that were moved home because of either the practicality of remote work or workplaces being shutdown varied regionally because of both policy and industry differences, and because the share of workplaces that use industrial style TP vs TP compatible with home style dispensers probably also varies considerably.)

        • mc32 1 hour ago
          True but office TP isn’t Charmin. So the demand for Scott would go down, but demand for northern quilted and Charmin would go up!
    • crote 44 minutes ago
      The end of Crucial is a symptom, not a cause. Crucial is merely Micron's factory brand. Nothing is stopping OEMs like G.Skill or Kingston from buying DRAM chips from Micron and putting them on consumer RAM sticks.

      Well, that's the theory at least. In practice it's more accurate to say that Micron had cut down their consumer allocation that not even their factory brand can get enough chips to survive.

    • nancyminusone 2 hours ago
      I just last week sold some DDR5 I bought in April for triple what I paid for it.
    • Sohcahtoa82 1 hour ago
      > The same exact G.skill z5 64Gb ram I bought 4 years ago is well on its way to being double the price.

      The RAM I bought last year has more than tripled. 2x32 DDR5 kits, $240/kit, now $820.

    • esseph 2 hours ago
      Crucial was shut down so they could focus on selling more ram to hyperscalers. That happened because of the state of things.

      Prices are not expected to recover until 2028.

      • CryptoBanker 1 hour ago
        The state of things...meaning AI companies buying up the world's supply of RAM
        • hshdhdhj4444 1 hour ago
          Yes.

          AI companies will continue to buy up all the RAM so you and I have to pay the cost for it.

          They will also eat up all the energy so you and I have to pay more for energy.

          They will also then try and put you and I out of a job.

          And if they fail to do so, they will then get your and my tax dollars to bail them out.

          There should be real AI research and technology development, but the way it’s being done right now is heads the AI hyperscalers win, tails, all of us lose.

          It’s being run as a massive scam against the rest of us.

          • cyanydeez 28 minutes ago
            Lets be honest: Most peoples computing needs have been satisfied in the last decade.

            FOMO and Number goes up is the primary issue both with AI and most compute today.

            There's so many made up numbers these days that does zero productive work, like FPS, refresh rates, 4k, 8k, 16k.

            Bloat is everywhere.

        • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
          I think maybe long-term the effect of Korean companies no longer daring to reuse old machines to produce DDR4 because of US retribution is the bigger cause of that.
  • WorldPeas 41 minutes ago
    There's an errant thing at the back of my mind, I can't help but wonder if this ram shortage could revive the ram dimm as a concept as so many manufacturers were adopting the soldered-ram approach. I'm sure though this won't come to pass
  • jordanb 1 hour ago
    At some point it's going to make sense to buy a computer without ram once the lack of ram pushes demand down for all other components.

    Maybe this won't last that long given the RAM shortage is apparently a corner attempt by Sam Altman.

    • acephal 55 minutes ago
      From what I've read, he's tied up RAM manufacturers through 2029. That's a lot of quartely earnings reports for many firms in the economy where they watch consumer spend come to a screeching halt.
      • klez 28 minutes ago
        One has to hope OpenAI goes bankrupt and they flood the market with used RAM sticks at bargain bin price.
        • teeray 20 minutes ago
          Don’t worry, they’ve cozied up for a nice fat bailout if that happens.
  • wmf 1 hour ago
    50% won't be enough so they'll need to raise prices again in a month or two.
  • insane_dreamer 1 hour ago
    Thanks, Sam :<
    • esafak 1 hour ago
      Horde it, Sam. For old times' sake.
      • chairmansteve 29 minutes ago
        It reminds me of the AI paperclip problem. The AIs are eating all the memory chips and energy. And GPUs of course.

        Except its caused by good old bubble capitalism.

  • ChrisArchitect 1 hour ago
    • sosodev 1 hour ago
      Thank you for sharing this. Their point about the 128GB desktop mainboard being a bargain while their prices remain low rings true. I bought one a couple weeks ago because I've been wanting to build a beefy, efficient home server and I think this might be the last window of affordability for quite a while.
  • j45 2 hours ago
    It seems easier to purchase from hardware vendors that have already locked in their prices for RAM.
    • hurturue 2 hours ago
      like Backblaze was purchasing HDDs from retail store, so will (small) AI providers
    • esseph 2 hours ago
      That will quickly run dry.
      • teeray 18 minutes ago
        Especially given the arbitrage opportunity that presents.
  • pengaru 1 hour ago
    I assembled a new 32c/64t 7970X threadripper with 128GB DDR5 and a 16GB RX9070XT over the summer...

    This memory situation has me pondering putting it all up on ebay

    • embedding-shape 1 hour ago
      I started thinking about it last spring, been slowly finding the ideal setup over time. Finally bit the bullet just like 5 days ago, fearing it's about to become worse rather than better, but it hurt as much anyway :/
    • jszymborski 52 minutes ago
      If DDR5 will still be around in two years, you might want to sell half of your RAM now and use those proceeds double it in a couple years?

      Or just cash out, that's always great.

  • dismalaf 1 hour ago
    What's wild is OpenAI doubling down on hyperscaling when it's obvious that the gains from pre-training are coming to an end. They seem determined to just go out in flames...
    • mschuster91 1 hour ago
      The thing is, it seems like they are planning to force everyone else out of the market. Acquire all the RAM they can possibly get, leave none for the competition, pray to survive the entire mess.

      It's the inevitable peak of the venture capital pipeline, just this time it isn't individual industries (e.g. taxis with Uber, hotels with AirBnB) getting squeezed out by unsustainable pricing - it's the economy at large that's suffering this time.

      And it's high time for us as a society to put an end to this madness. End the AI VC economy before it ends our economy.

      • riskable 1 hour ago
        Perhaps we can call this type of maneuver, "The Sam Altman": Your expensive business's mid-term outlook not looking so good? Why not use all that cash/credit to corner the market in some commodity in order to cripple your perceived competition?
        • mschuster91 1 hour ago
          He's not the first one though. The crypto miners used to do the same (I distinctly 'member first GPUs, then HDDs, then ordinary RAM being squoze by yet another new shitcoin in less than a year), and Uber plus the food delivery apps are a masterclass in how to destroy competition with seemingly infinite cash.
      • chairmansteve 24 minutes ago
        These gambits never work though. In 6 months you'll be able to get memory chips and GPUs for nothing.....

        There's a few historical examples here....

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornering_the_market

      • dismalaf 1 hour ago
        This is a huge Hail Mary... IMO they'd be better served slowing down the training pipeline, becoming profitable now, hiring a bunch of scientists and figuring out the next AI technology.
        • compass_copium 1 hour ago
          Agree with step 1 here but steps 2 and 4 are a total pipe dream
      • zb3 1 hour ago
        Was this market manipulation legal? If so, that's crazy..
        • mschuster91 1 hour ago
          Oh, both Uber and AirBnB did get dinged by the courts - but it took them years and the damage was already done, on top of that the fines were laughable.

          We need the corporate death penalty aka forced dissolution for egregious cases of misbehavior, we need easier ways to pierce the corporate veil (and I'm more and more inclined to actually support the death penalty here as well, despite the potential for abuse), we need corporate fines to all be measured % of gross income, at least double the profit margin.

          And we need all of that fast.

  • LetsGetTechnicl 54 minutes ago
    Great, another thing AI is ruining
  • hopelite 31 minutes ago
    It seems the only thing that could break this is the off chance that the SCOTUS rules that the tariffs are illegal and/or Congress strips the Presidency of the power they gave it in utters incompetence many decades ago.

    I’m thinking with sufficient pressure by all tech interested people it could become an issue in the midterms and even force Trump to sign agreements not to tariff RAM by Korean producers who could ramp up production.

    Frankly, I wouldn’t even be surprised if we start seeing RAM smuggling. In not sure of drug prices, but would smuggling RAM not be at least just as profitable, especially without the high profile and risk?

    Hey! … hey, you! You want to have some fun?

  • Ritewut 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • Group_B 1 hour ago
      This is not the same at all
    • greenavocado 1 hour ago
      Have you paid any attention to DDR5 prices prior to writing your comment? Answer Yes or No.
      • Ritewut 1 hour ago
        Yes, Framework made their comments like 1 or 2 days ago. They knew what was happening to RAM prices.
    • Kye 1 hour ago
      Where's the gouge? DDR5 prices went up more than the 50% they increased their price by.
      • yehat 57 minutes ago
        I wish prices went only 50% more... I see 300+% on the market now.
    • theyeenzbeanz 1 hour ago
      This is the fault of manufacturers fixing supply, especially in the case of micron, one of only 3 memory chip manufacturers, deciding to flip the bird to the non-AI consumer market.
      • drawnwren 1 hour ago
        Is this the "fault" or is it just the result of rational economic actors?
        • Kye 1 hour ago
          Oligopolies don't get to use the market forces defense.
  • meindnoch 2 hours ago
    cc @apple