19 comments

  • beloch 3 hours ago
    The U.S. government shutdown has halted pay to the TSA, but not ICE, so ICE is taking over from the TSA in airports[1]. If you fly to the U.S., starting Monday apparently, the first think you're likely to see is masked gunmen giving you the eye.

    No thankyou.

    [1]https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cede0qyvqz3o

    • nandomrumber 3 hours ago
      Would anyone argue that the TSA, Theatre Security Agency, shouldn’t be defunded?
      • Macha 2 hours ago
        Replacing it with nothing in an orderly fashion? Probably a good move.

        Replacing them with ICE as a political gesture? Not so much

      • derf_ 2 hours ago
        The TSA is responsible for more than just airports. As someone with family who works (worked) on port security in the maritime division, I would argue that Chesterton's Fence [0] applies here just as much as anywhere else.

        [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._K._Chesterton#Chesterton's_...

      • hmmokidk 3 hours ago
        This isn’t that.
      • tombert 3 hours ago
        There's an argument for that, though I think replacing it with Trump's basically-unregulated private military is pretty concerning.
    • diego_moita 2 hours ago
      It will be so much fun to watch the World Cup from outside the US...
    • taneq 3 hours ago
      I feel like "form your own private paramilitary organisation with minimal oversight, then expand their reach by having them take over the operations of other government departments" has been done before somewhere, as part of a larger plan.
      • nclin_ 3 hours ago
        This is a historical pattern: Bringing border forces to bear against your own population, because those border forces are trained to deal with people who don't have the rights of the state.
      • gotwaz 2 hours ago
        They dont have all the skills to do anything super complex in a sustainable way. Already proved in the first term. What their existence demonstrates is winning election is not super complex if you can find enough groups to precisely target and pander/capture attention. Social media has been a force multiplier for such behavior and the people that have emerged dont have any other skill other than attention capture. But thats short term win like full focus on marketing while product and operations have no hope of catching up. Every "large plan" will fail. Large plans in complex ever changing environments always need massive cooperation of very different skills. Never happens sustainably with just one skill dominating all.
        • mattoxic 2 hours ago
          They dont have all the skills to do anything super complex in a sustainable way.

          And that's stopped them?

          • gotwaz 2 hours ago
            We know the answer. Whats stopping ebola or a hurricane from over running everything?
      • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
        It has. (Unless you're being sarcastic, in which case I'm not surprised it went over my head. Lol.)
        • ajkjk 3 hours ago
          of course they were
          • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
            Hey, tone doesn't translate well over text, they did not use anu tone tags, and I'm already terrible at reading tone in the best of times. Lol, can you really blame me for at least asking? Haha.
        • taneq 50 minutes ago
          Yeah, I was aiming for irony but I should probably have added /s at the end there. It's definitely in the mid-late chapters in any "how to install a fascist regime" handbook.
    • fundad 2 hours ago
      Enter the country and you interact with CBP and that hasn't changed. CBP agents are the ones who murdered the legal observers in Minneapolis so there's that.

      TSA checks bags for commercial airlines which is a service that should never have been nationalized.

      • jordanb 2 hours ago
        It would really be amazing if the end result of all of this is the post-9/11 DHS finally gets reverted back to what we had before.
    • AceJohnny2 3 hours ago
      > So ICE is taking over from the TSA in airports

      It's even more disgusting than that:

      "Tom Homan: ICE officers will not assist with airport security scanning amid TSA staffing shortage"

      https://thehill.com/policy/transportation/5795316-homan-ice-...

      • bananalychee 2 hours ago
        I can't tell what's supposed to be disgusting about this unless you stopped reading past the inflammatory headline.
    • bdangubic 3 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • ohyoutravel 3 hours ago
        TSA is mostly people who want a job and act pretty professionally in the hundreds or thousand times I’ve encountered them. ICE encourages people with anger issues who hate brown people to apply. These are not the same.
        • bdangubic 3 hours ago
          it isn’t about people and which group is mostly this or that. Americans have long accepted to have their Constitutional Rights violated at the airports so it really doesn’t matter if it is TSA or ICE or whatever three-letter gang runs it
          • andrewflnr 3 hours ago
            This is binary thinking that has no place in predicting the real world. In practice, the specific person violating your constitutional rights makes a big difference in how badly your rights are violated.
  • cdrnsf 3 hours ago
    Funny, everyone outside of the US should exercise increased caution when dealing with or visiting the US.
    • Arubis 3 hours ago
      Also, everyone within the US already should exercise increased caution.
    • pier25 3 hours ago
      I travelled to the US some weeks ago and was anxious but everything turned out ok. I'm happy I don't have to go back any time soon.
      • JPKab 2 hours ago
        [flagged]
        • pier25 2 hours ago
          I won't share personal details but you couldn't be more wrong.
        • surgical_fire 2 hours ago
          Or maybe he just got lucky.

          Impossible to prove otherwise. No reason to try his luck.

        • dotancohen 2 hours ago
          [flagged]
          • JPKab 2 hours ago
            I worked in the Pentagon for 10 years, and got my beak wet with neural nets there very early, back when we were using Playstation 3s for their GPUs.

            I was staunchly against the Iraq war, but even when Bush was president I didn't let it compromise my patriotism.

            The amount of people on here who ignore the fact that Iran was the primary enabler of Hamas' attack on 10/7/23, and therefore sowed the seeds of the destruction of Gaza, is insane. Basically, if Trump does a thing, they are against it, independent of the thing. There is no principle, just reactionary hatred. If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it. I am 100% positive on that assumption.

            • galangalalgol 2 hours ago
              It seems like about 20% of people judge the actions of a us administration independent of their partisan positions. I am recently joined and cannot claim it is from any virtue on my part. A backlash against an attempted autocratic takeover is a common starting point for successful ones by an opposing party. Leftist autocratic coups are only slightly rarer than rightist ones. We are in the middle of an attempted rightist one, but that doesn't mean we are safe if we remove them.
            • nozzlegear 2 hours ago
              >If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it. I am 100% positive on that assumption.

              I think you're wrong here. As a Biden stan who's gone to the mat debating Biden's policies here on HN many times in the past, he lost pretty much all of the remaining good will he had by defending and supporting Israel for so long after it became clear what they were doing in Gaza. Biden wouldn't be getting a free pass in the Middle East if it were helping Israel's goals (ignoring the fact that Biden is much more of a dove than Trump).

            • surgical_fire 2 hours ago
              Oh yes, Iran enabled Hamas in a vacuum.

              Nothing happened prior to 10/07/23, no sir. Just an evil country doing evil things. Of course the US and Israel are victims on all this.

              • dotancohen 1 hour ago
                Yes, Hamas had been shooting rockets at Israel for almost two decades by that point.
            • mcphage 2 hours ago
              > Basically, if Trump does a thing, they are against it, independent of the thing.

              Because on top of doing terrible things, the non-terrible things he does, he does incredibly badly.

              > There is no principle, just reactionary hatred.

              No, we’re all good little Bayesians around here.

              > If Biden had launched this war, none of these people would have had a problem with it.

              You’re really missing what’s going on here. The reason that people liked Biden is that he would not have launched this war.

              • what 1 hour ago
                > The reason that people liked Biden is that he would not have launched this war.

                No, they liked him because he wasn’t Trump. And then they liked Trump more after having him.

            • anon7000 1 hour ago
              I highly disagree, one clear thing conservatives and liberals largely agree on is no more wars in the Middle East. It’s astonishing to me that Trump supporters who voted for an isolationist policy are happy with him intervening in the Middle East (not to mention South America) again.

              Yes, I am “reactively” hating our president for starting wars without congressional approval and with very handwavy explanations. Besides, he has a track record for saying whatever the fuck he wants if he thinks people will like it, so you can’t trust the words from his mouth anyways. It’s pretty infuriating, actually.

              I would be much happier if there was a clear justification and rational explanation for the president starting more wars in the Middle East. And yes, because Biden has a slightly better baseline of not telling bold-faced lies, I could see more people giving the benefit of the doubt at first. But overall, liberals did not like Biden very much. Trump, on the other hand, has a pretty hardcore base of people who don’t seem to care what he says or that he does/says the opposite of what he used to say. Pretty weird.

              By the way, this opinion is not formed by reading or listening to any kind of mainstream media. It’s formed from listening to the words coming out of Trump’s mouth for the past fucking decade.

              • dotancohen 1 hour ago
                If "no more wars in the middle east" means that America can not protect herself from a nation that regularly chants Death To America, then it really means "I'd rather see America as a society fail than stand up and defend myself".
        • nandomrumber 2 hours ago
          [flagged]
          • archagon 2 hours ago
            What is “white culture”?

            I re-flagged OP.

            • TheSpiceIsLife 1 hour ago
              White European culture, and including the USA, New Zealand, Australia, Canada, South Africa and Zimbabwe before they turned to shit.

              Freedom of expression, not executing gays or hunting them for sport; the end of slavery, universal suffrage, space exploration, being able to criticise the government.

              Am I allowed to have an opinion?

              If it differs from yours?

              Diversity. So long as I conform?

              • archagon 55 minutes ago
                What do you mean by European? Because as someone with Slavic heritage, I'd rather you excluded my culture from your nonsensically aggregated "Western European" culture. You don't get to claim Dostoyevsky, Pushkin, and Solzhenitsyn just because the color of our skin has a similar shade. In terms of religion, the Orthodox Church only has surface-level overlap with Evangelical Protestantism. And much like the Irish, Polish, and other "less desirable" European ethnicities, we weren't even considered fully white until sometime in the 20th century.

                Europe is a massive melting pot, not some single, monolithic "culture." In fact, I have much more in common with my Latino neighbors than the WASPs having conniptions over the purported decline of "white culture."

                > the end of slavery

                Lol, lmao. Well, it's pretty obvious what fetid corners of the web you lurk in.

    • 1over137 3 hours ago
      Or better yet: don't visit the USA at all.
      • cdrnsf 3 hours ago
        Indeed, particularly given that ICE agents are going to be deployed to airports. Their penchant for killing civilians and otherwise violating civil rights only to lie about their actions hardly seems like a good fit for airport security duties they haven’t been trained to perform.
        • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
          > duties they haven't been trained to perform

          Which implies they've been trained?

          • cdrnsf 2 hours ago
            Fair, they haven’t. I wonder how long it will take them to use tear gas when the line at a Starbucks kiosk gets a little too long.
        • nandomrumber 3 hours ago
          [dead]
        • throwawaytea 25 minutes ago
          Don't drive your car at agents, and don't get in wrestling matches with agents, and you'll be fine.
    • honeycrispy 3 hours ago
      [flagged]
  • jazzpush2 3 hours ago
    Has there been any official WH note on the need for this war, yet? Or objectives?
    • daheza 36 minutes ago
      They rebranded to the department of war but its not a war. We definitely don't want war, but we want all soldiers to be warriors. Still not warmongering.
    • mememememememo 3 hours ago
      This war is not a war. Not a.war war. Just a "war". No war has been declared.
      • refulgentis 1 hour ago
        It's a special operation
      • briantakita 2 hours ago
        We already won. Are you tired of winning yet?
    • bdangubic 3 hours ago
      20 or so far, there is a new one each day
      • nclin_ 3 hours ago
        Yes, they are flooding the zone with many alternative explanations so that they're both all deniable, and all accessible to anyone who finds just one of them convincing. This is a strategy.
      • giwook 3 hours ago
        And all of them different from the last and/or contradicting each other at times.

        It's like throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks.

        • nandomrumber 2 hours ago
          Probably spaghetti.
        • cogman10 3 hours ago
          All I know is we are accomplishing them and we'll be done in 3 weeks to 3 years. Also, this isn't a woke war, which I was worried about.
    • dotancohen 3 hours ago
      It might have something to do with the nation which chants "Death to America" also developing nuclear bombs and ballistic missiles.
      • engcoach 2 hours ago
        Why do they chant that? Is it due to acting against US interests in favor of another state, maybe one in the Levant?
        • nozzlegear 2 hours ago
          What are you saying? Speak plainly so we don't have to guess.
        • dotancohen 1 hour ago
          No, they chant Death To America because the United States is a successful, secular society based on Christian values. That is perceived as a direct threat to an Islamic Republic which funds the spread of Shia Islam. The US was also an ally of the Shah.

          Khomeini regularly said that the United States was the cause of all Muslims' problems - and his hatred of Israel was due to her being the only regional US ally. You've got the cause and effect backwards.

          You need to learn about the history of this conflict if you're going to express an idealogical viewpoint on the subject.

      • MSM 2 hours ago
        "Bombings will continue until you stop hating us"
  • cogman10 3 hours ago
    Is this an orange, purple, or magenta threat level?
    • SlightlyLeftPad 3 hours ago
      Approaching ultraviolet, invisible to the naked eye but still very much a threat. “there is no war, only excursions.”
  • softwaredoug 3 hours ago
    This is so non-specific to be meaningless.

    Like actually tell us what you know so we can make useful decisions about our safety.

    • alephnerd 3 hours ago
      > Like actually tell us what you know so we can make useful decisions about our safety

      "Americans abroad should follow the guidance in security alerts issued by the nearest U.S. embassy or consulate."

  • ggm 2 hours ago
    Would the current state of affairs qualify for cancelling the mid-terms? Is that overly cynical?

    Not in the US, not a US citizen or voter. My suspicion is the answer is "no, but it is not a given that a competent supreme court which looks likely to overturn the WH exists, if they say they want to do this"

    • atq2119 2 hours ago
      AFAIUI, elections in the US are not run by the federal government but by the states.

      Trying to cancel elections seems like it'd be a lot harder than in other countries.

    • JPKab 2 hours ago
      It's absolutely overly cynical and also evidence that you are completely misinformed.

      It's never happened in the entire history of this country, including when we literally had a Civil War.

      Your media sources are creating a belief in your head that is utterly deranged from reality.

      For example, ICE agents haven't "murdered legal observers" in any other locations than Minneapolis, despite the fact that they are operating all over the country. The reason for this is that the "legal observers" were actually super aggressive protesters in an environment that bordered on a riot due to the fact that local police were not creating a perimeter for these operations. Note that none of this has happened in Texas or Arizona or North Carolina or Florida, despite the fact that vastly more deportations are occurring in those locations. But your media doesn't tell you these details, does it?

      • incze 1 hour ago
        seems from outside, that many things happen, that's never happened in the entire history of this country, as your prez says many times a day, that "you've never seen before".

        otoh, i saw ice agents to murder a super aggresive protester, who was actually trying to help a super aggressive woman dumped to the earth by ice agents, from many angle. also, and i followed minnesotans aggressively filming everywhere what happens to them. and i saw, how aggressive they were to bovino and co.

        so, i really understand your rant.

        • throwawaytea 23 minutes ago
          If you can't follow basic police orders, you probably shouldn't visit the US, that's for sure.
      • zzrrt 2 hours ago
        > Texas or Arizona or North Carolina or Florida

        All Red states. So if you roll over and let the federal government trample your state's sovereignty, they won't murder people in your state? Somehow I don't think that's what federalism was supposed to mean.

        Trump nearly passed out with glee when he was talking to the Ukrainian president and found out elections are canceled, by their law, due to martial law because of the war. I would not so casually assume he won't try it here.

        • anon7000 1 hour ago
          Seriously, it’s totally fair to think that there’s no way they’ll be cancelled. There are some checks and balances left. But if you voted for Trump, you should be DEEPLY concerned about how much he loves toying with the idea. It’s frankly more impeachable than nearly anything I’ve heard of, since it’d be fucking treasonous to cancel elections. Demand better from your representatives and officials, and stop voting MAGA so we can get out of this mess.
  • cmdrmac 3 hours ago
    My first thought: You don't say?
    • agnishom 3 hours ago
      Right? What kind of person does not follow the news but subscribes to the State Department notifications?
      • nandomrumber 2 hours ago
        All the people who decided to stay in the Middle East even when the second carrier group was en route, and then thought they were news worth enough to get on camera and comment about there being no commercial flights out of there.
  • marysminefnuf 44 minutes ago
    So the presidents personal law enforcement that is tasked with racially profiling people who overwhelmingly do not pose a threat are going to now be conducting security directly from the source where millions of foreign travelers come through…hmmm…ridiculous
  • mrbombastic 3 hours ago
    Crazy how effective at making everything worse this admin has been.
    • arvid-lind 3 hours ago
      That's the strategy of Project 2025, make all the nice things we have much worse and broken so there's no choice but to scrap and start over. While they're in charge, of course.
      • MengerSponge 3 hours ago
        Showing that government doesn't work by making sure government doesn't work.
      • fundad 2 hours ago
        Project 2025 and the Trump administration is the most success ant-growth movements have ever had.
        • xnx 1 hour ago
          Horseshoe theory
    • stackghost 3 hours ago
      Trump is but a symptom of an underlying sickness. Things won't magically go back to normal after he dies.
      • majormajor 3 hours ago
        Very few other people have Trump's ability to channel frustration in a nonspecific-but-charismatic way that connects the various extreme factions of the American right.

        None of those factions will be gone, but their battles will weaken their cause more than they have since 2016.

        Some of this can be seen by how even his own popularity falls any time he actually has power, since there are no effective ideas there, only misplaced blame, and that doesn't sustain support for four years. Without him there at all in an out-of-power period, the "blame the Jews"/"blame the brown people"/"blame the women"/"blame the baby-killers"/"blame the anti-Semites"/"blame the sexual deviants" factions will likely fail to find another person they all rally around.

        • goosejuice 2 hours ago
          The extreme factions of the right are a very small portion of the electorate. They generally don't decide elections beyond the primaries and generally turn out in favor of the right regardless.

          Dems lean more on moderates/independents. Trump won because he persuaded that group, particularly the young men.

          https://www.thirdway.org/memo/why-republicans-can-win-with-t...

          • fakedang 1 hour ago
            25-33% of the electorate is no small fraction. There's a group of people who have been consistently supportive of this government's policies since 2016. Take any policy survey, and the fraction that supports the right-wing side of action always amounts to a consistent 25-33% of the votes.
            • goosejuice 7 minutes ago
              You're going to have to define extreme right with those percentages. You think 25-33% of the electorate is extreme right?
        • fakedang 1 hour ago
          > Trump's ability to channel frustration in a nonspecific-but-charismatic way

          If Trump is the most charismatic political personality America has to offer...

      • malfist 3 hours ago
        Did someone say they would?
        • lyu07282 2 hours ago
          Many liberal people think he is an abberation, they would gladly return back to "normal". The point is, he is a symptom of a larger unaddressed sickness, there is no return to business as usual, it will only return far worse.

          To prompt with something more specific: there is a possibility of a Gavin Newsom vs. Tucker Carlson in 2028, it's crucial to understand why Tucker might win and why he would be ten times worse than Trump.

        • greenavocado 3 hours ago
          Most people think Trump is the lynchpin, when in fact, its his masters that decide what happens next.
          • andrewflnr 3 hours ago
            Even if he was, a lot of things have been destroyed that will take a lot longer to rebuild. Notably, trust.
          • stuaxo 3 hours ago
            It would delay things, he has a "charisma" that his followers look like.

            But it's true he is a symptom.

            • greenavocado 49 minutes ago
              He is not a symptom he is an actor that is playing a part in a script. He is manipulated, bullied, and blackmailed into submission.
      • JeremyNT 2 hours ago
        Having somebody less incompetent, senile, and corrupt at the helm may not make things "magically go back to normal," but it's a step in the right direction. Necessary but not sufficient.

        Perhaps you'll be explicit though, what is the "sickness" you perceive?

        • throwawaytea 21 minutes ago
          The main problem with your thinking is that you fail to realiZe that a lot of conservatives criticism of Trump is that he is too weak on the things he promised to be hard on. They want MORE ICE, more cuts to government programs, more police.
        • stackghost 1 hour ago
          >Perhaps you'll be explicit though, what is the "sickness" you perceive?

          It's that a significant number of Americans are mean, selfish, racist, arrogant, and delight in the victimization of those they perceive as belonging to an outgroup.

          2/3 of your electorate either voted for him (meaning they liked what they saw) or were sufficiently unbothered by him to not vote (meaning they were more or less okay with Trump).

          These crocodile tears about how "we were bamboozled" are just that. It was plainly obvious to the rest of us looking in from outside, even before his first term but certainly after, that he was exactly the person he is now, and fully two thirds of American voters accepted this.

      • nozzlegear 2 hours ago
        Could you enlighten the class as to what you believe the underlying sickness is?
      • michaelhoney 3 hours ago
        It will be a lot harder to convince voters when he's gone... if the US still has elections
        • nozzlegear 2 hours ago
          Why wouldn't it?
          • CamperBob2 1 hour ago
            Trump has assured us there will be no need for them. I believe him. He lies a lot, but not about his own ambitions.
      • jb827 2 hours ago
        America has neglected working class people for decades. The economy has shifted from supporting earning income to make a decent living, to protecting assets (bail outs etc.) Trump tapped into this and tricked these people into electing him, bringing along right wing or whatever they are.. and they got hold of power. Don't think numbers are there for this culture war crowd to stay in power unless they hitch a ride with someone. (edited: typo)
    • JPKab 3 hours ago
      You know what else would make everything worse? A totalitarian theocratic regime with long range ballistic missiles and nukes.

      But hey, it's not like they funded and backed a bunch of theocratic fanatics who committed a mass atrocity in Israel and provoked a war that destroyed Gaza or anything, right? Or that they were exporting massive quantities of drones to Putin for him to use to murder Ukrainian civilians, right? They were nice guys, and the 35K protesters they murdered deserved it, right?

      We should have just let things keep rolling the way they were. It was all going so well, and at no point would the regime that was actively inciting terrorism all over the world for the last 47 years be a threat if they got nukes on the ICBMs we now know they had been a problem. I mean, heck, those missiles they shot at Diego Garcia were just fireworks, purely for decorative purposes, right?

      The HN bubble is truly grand. My college girlfriend was the daughter of parents who fled the Ayatollah in 79. You people on here think everyone shares your values and worldview, and that the mullahs in Iran are rational actors. They are not. They are part of a specific sect of Shiite Islam that truly believes that bringing about an apocalypse is a desirable thing. It's such a foreign concept to you that you dismiss it as fantasy and misinformation. But it's real. And you simply lack the life experience to know it. You've never seen entire masses of people infected with the radical religious mind viruses that those of us with firsthand experience with religious fundamentalists have seen.

      Imagine the Branch Davidians in Waco with nukes, and you start to scratch the surface of what this would look like if you let it play out.

      • solid_fuel 2 hours ago
        > A totalitarian theocratic regime with long range ballistic missiles and nukes.

        Man, imagine that, how scary. I bet in theocratic regimes there's a bunch of stupid stuff going on, like a ~Secretary~ Minister of ~War~ Defense that justifies an attack on a foreign nation by calling it a holy war and prays every time he gives a speech to the troops.

        Those theocrats probably do things like de-funding every science project they can when they get power. Or worse, maybe they think vaccines are against god's will and get a bunch of kids sick by opposing vaccines for preventable diseases. Hell they probably don't even teach their kids about evolution or gay people.

        Can you imagine if a nation like that had nuclear weapons and long range missiles? Why, they might start a war for no reason.

      • bdangubic 41 minutes ago
        was this copy/pasted from a post from 30 years ago or was it typed up from scratch?
      • archagon 2 hours ago
        47 years? What a convenient sounding number. Wonder where you got it from.
      • mrbombastic 2 hours ago
        You certainly built a large strawman out of one sentence.
      • cogman10 2 hours ago
        Yeah it's a good thing we dismantled that regime and totally didn't empower the most extreme and radical portion of it while removing the politicians who'd tempered that and turned the population against the US and Israel.

        But hey, at least we've lifted sanctions and we are now sending them even more money because the oil market was completely destroyed so that's great right?

        Obviously this is the best strategy because we can see how the Taliban was completely dismantled in Afghanistan after 20 years of occupation right?

        Unless you are proposing genocide of Iran or an eternal occupation, what we've done is kicked a hornets nest.

      • TacticalCoder 2 hours ago
        > The HN bubble is truly grand.

        I feel the same. People have been brainwashed into hating people from their own countries (either the US or countries in Europe) so much that they'll rationalize islamism as a defense mechanism: when people chant "death to america" and burn american flags on campuses, they see nothing wrong.

        When there are "sharia patrol" cars driven by bearded men in a major US city, they see nothing wrong.

        When the mayor of NYC say it's now time for american citizens to "follow the teachings of Muhammad" (oh we could talk about his life), they still see nothing wrong. I think that mayor has been seen inviting a known terrorist recently too (don't have the link but I'm not surprised).

        We're talking about people who are rooting for a regime publicly hanging athletes for speaking against islamism and sending islamist guards into hospitals to finish the wounded.

        I'm 100% convinced that the islamist republic of Iran would nuke Israel with the atom bomb as soon as they'd have it. These people, just like Hamas, have sworn they'll erase Israel off the map.

        I'm not jewish but I know that after Israel, I'm next.

        It's sadly impossible to have a discussion with those refusing to see the inherent evil of islamism. And usually westerners people constantly refusing to criticize islamism tend to be the very same who defend feminism and who make, shamelessly, fun of christians (and I'm no christian either btw): go figure.

      • jghn 3 hours ago
        I honestly thought you were talking about the US in your first paragraph.
        • JPKab 2 hours ago
          The narcissism of small differences on full display here.

          There isn't a single "red state" in the US that requires women to cover their heads and bodies in public or executes people for speaking out against the "regime".

          But you pretend like that's the case, while acting like Iran was just minding their own business when they have exported terror for decades, along with drones being used to murder Ukrainian civilians. I mean, I guess supporting Ukraine was soooo 2022-23, and now we're on to the new fashion trend of supporting the people helping to murder them because "orange man bad."

          • awnird 2 hours ago
            Israel has killed more civilians than Russia and Iran combined.

            I don’t think your concern for civilian casualties is genuine.

      • awnird 2 hours ago
        Hey, you forgot “they hate us for our freedoms” in your propaganda spiel.
      • lyu07282 2 hours ago
        I agree THAT ethno nationalist country in the middle east, with long-range ballistic missiles, secret nukes and a secret nuclear doctrine that hasn't signed any Non-Proliferation treaty should make everybody worried. But that country isn't Iran.

        It's the only country in the world with nuclear weapons that at this moment gets bombarded by missiles right now, if that doesn't make you worried you aren't paying attention.

    • elromulous 3 hours ago
      Agreed. But also why are you speaking like Yoda?
      • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
        They're not; they're speaking colloquially: this is the word "It's" omitted from the beginning.

        ---

        *EDIT*: Corrected word. Lol.

        • rdiddly 2 hours ago
          That's not what made it sound like Yoda. It was sticking "has been" at the end, and I agree there was a better choice stylistically: "Crazy how effective this admin has been at making everything worse."
          • mrbombastic 2 hours ago
            Didn’t even strike me as weird phrasing. Or rather: strike me as weird phrasing it did not.
        • daemonologist 3 hours ago
          "It's," perhaps?
          • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
            Yeah, nope, you're right. Not sure why my brain thought "The". Haha. I blame on the roughlu 2½ hours of sleep I got last night. Yay insomnia!
  • ceejayoz 3 hours ago
    I am tired of winning.
    • fouc 3 hours ago
      winning what?
      • toomuchtodo 3 hours ago
        One of President Donald Trump’s lines during the 2016 presidential campaign was his promise that, “We’re gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning. And you’ll say, ‘Please, please. It’s too much winning. We can’t take it anymore, Mr. President, it’s too much.’ And I’ll say, ‘No it isn’t. We have to keep winning. We have to win more!’”

        https://www.c-span.org/clip/campaign-2016/user-clip-too-much...

        Trump says US is 'winning so much' in longest ever State of the Union - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhQUGjRtq-M - February 25th, 2026

        Hence the joke, "I am tired of winning." as the situation continues to rapidly degrade through policy choices. So much winning, it's too much.

    • calvinmorrison 3 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • jazzpush2 3 hours ago
        Would you qualify complaining about starting an unnecessary war as "whining"? Why? What about ICE agents killing American citizens? Adding unprecedented numbers to the federal deficit, etc.?

        How nice it must be to be able to just dismiss these things.

        • SanjayMehta 3 hours ago
          > How nice it must be to be able to just dismiss these things.

          I don't know anyone in the US in real life who is happy with the current situation, including people who voted for Trump. The cheer leaders are only visible online.

          The people who voted for Harris are saying "we told you so," and the others are saying "he conned us."

          • encrypted_bird 3 hours ago
            I'm not sure where you live, but try going to some of the super-small towns in the Midwest. I unfortunately still see people openly wearing MAGA hats and have MAGA flags on the flag poles in their yards.

            Trust me, as sad as it is, those people still exist.

          • cogman10 3 hours ago
            For the people I know, it's mostly just been quiet silence, they don't really want to talk about it (and I don't force it). I know this is uncomfortable for them.

            Outside that, what I've noticed in my area is a whole lot less trucks driving around with cartoonishly large American flags and pro-trump bumper stickers. Even homes that proudly flew the "Trump 2024" flags and flew the 2020 flags for a long time have taken those down.

            Republicans here (Idaho) have been gleefully touching every 3rd rail (Medicaid, public school funding, public lands). I don't really have hope that the electorate will do anything about it, but who knows. I've never really seen such bold actions against the citizenry.

          • stavros 3 hours ago
            I don't understand the "he conned us" stance. He was literally saying all these things before getting elected. He wasn't being coy about it, we all knew it would be terrible, and here we are. What was the con exactly?

            If there's one thing you can't accuse Trump of, it's ever masking how utterly nonsensical he is.

            • beedeebeedee 3 hours ago
              Saying “he conned us” is easier for people to accept than being introspective, taking responsibility and experiencing ego dissolution.
            • pasquinelli 3 hours ago
              i thought he was more anti-war
          • calvinmorrison 3 hours ago
            There are petty peevish folks too, to quote myself lately

            October 2025

            "I believe Trumps gutting of institutions of learning, culture, democracy, law is punishment for the Branch Covidians. I believe this punishment must continue for some time until the lesson is learned about abuse of power"

            Should we reconcile this great nation, not balkanize, not be in an antebellum period, not be a Weimar republic, and walk back the rubicon and cross into more quiet waters, we must turn our attention to what made this country great. What has made it unique? That our constitution is explicit about what freedoms and rights are reserved for the people and are not to be trampled, touched, or looked at by the government. State, Local, or Federal. Our founding fathers and great men who preceded us recognized government as a necessary evil, one that must be kept at bay, not used as a violent tool to achieve outcomes. All of these institutions must walk back their power, give the rights back to the people, to be truly afraid of the populace. Each tax collector must shiver when he goes to work, and each police officer be fully aware that a single parking ticket is an act of violence.

            All said, I am afraid, we have lost that. And now we must face the future hoping that someday, another group of smart men can realize something so unique, so right, so innately just and moral was achieved by the signing of the constitution that it must be tried again.

            Calvin - 2022

  • dzonga 3 hours ago
    why are common people paying for the incompetence of a gvt.

    to not be political this lies at the heart of principles, morals, meritocracy

    values that the current gvt lacks & things that drove america forward.

    • tremon 3 hours ago
      That's because the common people voted for the incompetent. Not being political either, of course.
      • dotancohen 3 hours ago
        In what part of the world does the populace not suffer for the incompetence of their leaders? St. Petersburg? Ramallah? Port Au Prince?
    • terminalshort 1 hour ago
      Because it's the government they voted in. Typical American take. Wanting no responsibility for the adverse effects of your decision.
      • tombert 1 hour ago
        I'm American, I didn't vote for Trump, so I don't feel like it's me dealing with adverse effects of my decisions.

        I did vote for Eric Adams in NYC, and while Eric Adams didn't advertise blatant corruption as part of his campaign, insofar that I can be blamed for his idiocy and bribes I will accept responsibility. I didn't vote for him the second time around and I feel foolish for voting for him the first time.

    • hsbauauvhabzb 3 hours ago
      People vote for the current government. I’m not sure why you would expect others’ to pay for americas internal messes, we’re already busy dealing with the external ones.
    • refurb 2 hours ago
      The federal government hasn't passed a budget because the Democrats are blocking it. They feel it's worth the political gamble to cause Americans pain and that it'll turn on Trump.

      There you go - mystery solved.

  • bdangubic 3 hours ago
    I got jumped in Italy couple of weeks ago. I was wearing a "volleyball dad" hoodie my kid bought for me but did not realize that the "volleyball dad" is etched in the middle of a large American flag covering my entire back. Luckily (for him, not me :) ) three police officers were 10 meters away walking the area dealing with apre ski drunks and restrained him. fun times
    • razodactyl 3 hours ago
      Crazy does and crazy do. Be vigilant and try not to set these people off. There's no rhyme or reason, some people are just faulty in the head.
    • terminalshort 1 hour ago
      Didn't happen
    • kylehotchkiss 3 hours ago
      oof I would not wear an American flag outside the country. We've hurt too many feelings. Like any good American though, a Canadian flag works.
      • stackghost 3 hours ago
        >Like any good American though, a Canadian flag works.

        Please don't do this.

      • nclin_ 3 hours ago
        people*
    • lyu07282 3 hours ago
      r/thathappened
  • tombert 3 hours ago
    What the fuck was even the intended purpose of starting this war in Iran? Like in their mind, what was the best case scenario?
    • dotancohen 2 hours ago
      Best case scenario was probably keeping nuclear weapons and basaltic missiles out of the hands of those who chant Death to America.
      • macintux 2 hours ago
        Maybe ripping up the international plan to keep Iran from gaining nuclear weapons during his first term wasn’t the best idea.
        • dotancohen 1 hour ago
          That plan would have expired ten years after January 2016. In other words, already excited two months ago.

          It was a ten year plan, not a permanent plan.

      • engcoach 2 hours ago
        That’s going to age as well as weapons of mass destruction in Iraq did. The reality is that only Israel was threatened by Iran and the US is caught up in it simply because we act as their vassal.
        • dotancohen 1 hour ago
          Then how do you explain the rockets taking on Saudi Arabia? Baharain? UAE? Even Diego Garcia - which is further from Iran than Israel is. Just as far as Europe is. So they were only developing weapons that could target Israel?
        • terminalshort 1 hour ago
          The fact that Iran has now launched missiles at civilian areas in a dozen or so countries unrelated to the war shows that this is clearly false.
      • zzrrt 2 hours ago
        But Trump already obliterated their nuclear capacity last year! Were they lying then or now?
  • drgo 3 hours ago
    A small price for demonstrating that our El-Douche is always right and a stable genius.
  • refulgentis 3 hours ago
    lol.

    The current situation has been giving me so many flashbacks. Here, my GWB-era teens had the terror threat level, and now we're lazily reimagining State Department traveling warnings as a dark slapstick version (be afraid everywhere, American!)

  • UltraSane 3 hours ago
    Trump wrecks everything he touches.
    • bradleyankrom 3 hours ago
      Bankrupting a casino is a literal thing he did and also a pretty decent metaphor for what he's doing now.
    • cindyllm 3 hours ago
      [dead]
  • wileydragonfly 3 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • readitalready 3 hours ago
    When do we expect Iranians to actually attack US military bases outside the middle east? I heard there were already drones flying over bases in the US: https://wjla.com/news/local/unidentified-drones-fly-over-for...