The lost joy of music piracy

(pigeonsandplanes.com)

176 points | by mcgin 3 hours ago

31 comments

  • CoolestBeans 50 minutes ago
    One thing I miss about the iPod era is that Apple knew they were selling a device to play pirated music. It doesn't take much look at how much music an iPod could store, how much music cost, and how much people had in disposable income to spend on music to realize that music had to come from other means. The iPod and P2P file sharing were incredibly synergistic in a way that makes me giggle. The iTunes store is just as much about getting the record companies on board as it is about running a legitimate music store. I don't know I guess it reminds me of a time when tech disruption was in the consumer's favor and it was frustrating exploitive companies.
    • erikschoster 1 minute ago
      It was also common to have a collection of CDs you owned and wanted to put on a device like this.
    • hdgvhicv 1 minute ago
      The first one had no wifi and less space than a nomad - 5g from memory. That’s about 85 hours at 128k.

      I had more than that in CDs at the time.

    • Cthulhu_ 25 minutes ago
      I'd even go as far as argue that all streaming has its origins in piracy - Spotify seeded its catalog with pirated music (allegedly), Crunchyroll started off as an anime piracy site, etc.
    • rusk 10 minutes ago
      > Apple knew they were selling a device to play pirated music

      If I’m remembering right, the tagline on the Mac mini was “rip mix burn”

  • eisa01 56 minutes ago
    It's important to remember that to this day, streaming sites do not have a full archive of the music out there. There is still a need for music piracy

    Even albums mentioned in the Norwegian business magazine D2 can be impossible to find in legit channels. Your only option is to buy used CDs on Discogs for 50-100 USD, or know your way around the successors of these sites

    These CDs weren’t even on Oink or What (or did not survive the transitions)

    https://www.dn.no/d2/musikk/stena-line/lars-holte/spotify/ha...

    • wodenokoto 36 minutes ago
      I think the streaming sites are in a difficult position.

      On one hand I expect access to the worlds music, but on the other hand I also expect not to be drowned in 8bit covers and AI music.

      They are - to me at least - also an arbiter of music, similarly to how record stores used to be.

    • DaanDL 23 minutes ago
      What I also miss on Spotify: live mixes.
  • Semaphor 36 minutes ago
    I loved OiNK (and had the t-shirt), but neither What.cd nor waffles ever were a proper replacement for me.

    What got me that feeling of discovery again, decades later, and even surpassed it, was doing release Fridays and just listening.

    I mostly know what (sub)-genres I like, I go through upcoming release lists for the next week, open every bandcamp link in a new tab (or for those that don’t have bandcamp, I see if I care about the genre enough to search for a single on YouTube), and then I have maybe a hundred links, I sample everything for a few seconds and decide on yay or nay, and about 10 - 20 % go onto my excel sheet. Then on Fridays (up to Sunday, depending on how busy the release day is) I start listening to all those albums to see which of those I’ll buy (usually 1-2).

    It’s some effort, but my appreciation for music was never this high.

    • emsixteen 24 minutes ago
      I really loved OiNK and all of that era. Was genuinely gutted when it all fell apart, as it was also about the community of it all. Always wanted a tee - I'm envious.

      When waffles and What.cd appeared it seemed to me like waffles would be the long-term successor, but definitely didn't work out that way. Neither ever felt the same, and I wasn't engaged with them like I had been on OiNK.

      Nowadays I'm just another streaming service zombie when it comes to music, aside from my old library sitting in Plexamp, like my own little musical time capsule.

      • sixtyj 3 minutes ago
        I haven’t seen the headline before, so I searched it now. And it seems you can have your T-shirt :) Redbubble or other on-demand print sites have it available.
  • DaanDL 3 minutes ago
    Biggest thing I miss about all of this was the gatekeeping and curation really. There's so much garbage on Spotify, it's hard to find good music, and the recommendations I get always safely stay in what I already listened to.
  • omgmajk 1 hour ago
    Music piracy is alive and well if you know where to look. Some places has been mentioned in this thread already. Of course there is no replacing the magic of early 2000-2010's p2p sites like OiNK, What and Waffles - but well curated sites still exist.
    • muppetman 50 minutes ago
      Indeed. I'm a member of a few music trackers and they have a lot of great stuff, but What's archive was amazing. One of my proudest things I own is a What.cd beer cooler I bought from them.
      • omgmajk 43 minutes ago
        Never bought any merch from what, but I do own a ScT t-shirt :)
  • minikomi 1 hour ago
    Very fond memories of using Audiogalaxy, and also soulseek.

    Soulseek especially had a community where you found someone who was into the same kind of music as you (obscure breakcore! japanese garage punk!) and could browse their collections, and chat to them also! What a wonderful way to make music friends and get good recommendations.

    • smcleod 54 minutes ago
      Soulseek is still going hard.
    • jbaiter 58 minutes ago
      It's still there!
  • maxaw 1 hour ago
    What a cool article. I have good memories of being 13 and my cousin telling me about limewire. Between random pornography titles there was an artist called burial, which I downloaded cause I thought it sounded edgy. How lucky was I!
    • ndesaulniers 24 minutes ago
      Final Fantasy FMVs set to edgy nu metal.

      Man, I _had_ a limewire shirt (somewhere); they interviewed at my college. Where is that important piece of history?

  • sondr3 46 minutes ago
    I still have my invitation email to What.CD and cherish the stuff I found and downloaded on it. After it went away I didn't do the reasonable thing and migrate to RED/OPS immediately, though I've joined OPS in recent years. It does not feel the same, but that's probably more me being older and less optimistic than during the What.CD days. I have fond memories of reading the forum threads about jazz when I was getting into it, or looking at all the weird collections people made (I vividly remember laughing at the "albums with feet on the cover"-collection) or finding really obscure, local artists you couldn't find anywhere else or going to the public library to rent CD's to rip and upload for credits. Fun times.
  • soundworlds 58 minutes ago
    Reminds me of the System of a Down - Legend of Zelda song that was popular around Limewire, etc

    Years later it was uncovered that it was never System of a Down, but one Joe Pleiman

    https://kotaku.com/no-system-of-a-down-did-not-make-a-zelda-...

    • Cthulhu_ 18 minutes ago
      Man the amount of mistagged artists on Limewire and co. I got Blind Guardian as a bonus track to Dimmu Borgir - I'm not complaining, that song slapped, it was just a bit jarring to go to power metal at the end of my burned CD.
    • artemonster 48 minutes ago
      A lot of my peers were adamant that nirvanas song is „smeells like team spirit“ because this is how pirated mp3 on local DC (i think it was called that) p2p exchange was called
      • DaanDL 7 minutes ago
        DC++

        I loved that place, being able to browse people's hard drives was ingenious.

  • ilvez 30 minutes ago
    Closed private trackers are bastions of hope of preserving human culture. Every iteration since oink, they have become better and better and while at one point they will close the current ones, we will persevere. Where else would we find forgotten underground music only few people remember and how specific vinyl sounds. It's the community and love for music.
  • dewey 23 minutes ago
    Great read! I spent many many hours during my student times as part of the team interviewing new members for What.cd about audio encoding settings, the rules of the site and its one of the times I look back on often. Made great friends, improved my English and spent most of my day on IRC. There’s so many good stories from this time and I wish the forums would’ve been preserved.
  • abhikul0 46 minutes ago
    > Most people didn't have the same kind of experience, they got the LimeWire version which was the equivalent of wading through a dollar store that’s just been ransacked and shit’s all over the floor.

    Heh, I often went a step down and recorded internet radio using RadioSure. This little utility split each track into its own file which was pretty neat and handy to a younger me. Shoutout to Ryan Seacrests' AT40 for the weekly charts on the weekends, it kept my "collection" fresh ;-) Although, it was mostly 128-256kbps mp3 but it didn't matter to me, it was fun.

  • ColdStream 1 hour ago
    Huh... I'm still waiting for Bandcamp and Soundcloud to close their streaming download hole. It has been a few years now.
    • nmfisher 1 hour ago
      If you're on Bandcamp or Soundcloud it's usually because you want to support artists directly, I doubt many people are purely interested in getting free music rips.
      • ColdStream 1 hour ago
        Pretty much. There would be some folks who are scraping large amounts of stuff but I don't think it is a giant issue.
    • 9dev 1 hour ago
      Posting that here is one of the more promising ways of achieving that
      • noduerme 1 hour ago
        That's such small potatoes. Anyone putting out an album on Bandcamp is probably thrilled that someone would want to pirate it.
        • tmountain 59 minutes ago
          As a musician, I can agree with this 100%.
      • ColdStream 1 hour ago
        Yeah probably. But it also depends on how much it is exploited.

        If 0.1% of people do it, then it probably isn't worth while. If it 10% of the audience, that needs to be focused on.

    • markasoftware 1 hour ago
      does it matter as long as yt-dlp is maintained?
      • BoingBoomTschak 1 hour ago
        Some people want more than "mystery meat" levels of audio quality.
        • ColdStream 1 hour ago
          I once did a blind test on myself. A FLAC audio file and a 128Kbit Ogg vorbis file of the same track that I could switch between as I pleased but without knowing which was playing. Yeah, I cannot tell the difference.

          I am absolutely sure others can, but not me. I also think credit goes to far better encoders today than what we had 25 years ago.

          • t-3 0 minutes ago
            I can't tell the difference with most headphones, but with monitors or a good system in a good listening environment there are some details that get lost in compression, but there's essentially 0 difference from losslezd if I rip a CD to opus or mp3 rather than from a stream.
          • seba_dos1 57 minutes ago
            Opus - perhaps, but claiming that 128kbps Vorbis is transparent would be rather stretching it (unless it's a mono stream); though how easily it will be detectable depends on the kind of music used to test it. However, if you added, say, Bluetooth A2DP to the mix and made it go through a lossy encoder again the difference should be pretty obvious to anyone with good ears.
          • bluescrn 53 minutes ago
            Hearing also degrades over time. In my 20s I was a lot more fussy about audio formats and hi-fi gear.

            Approaching 50, with less sensitive ears and a bit of tinnitus, I’m happy with the convenience of Bluetooth headphones and whatever format Spotify uses.

          • gfody 23 minutes ago
            crappy speakers?
        • Semaphor 44 minutes ago
          But bandcamp is only 128 kbit MP3 for free streaming, now that’s not a mystery, but probably also not worse than whatever YT offers.
    • flipped 1 hour ago
      [dead]
  • ndesaulniers 23 minutes ago
    Just setup lidarr and plex. Not happy about having to re-arrange all my loose files, but claude and beets are helping.
  • userbinator 1 hour ago
    I would not be surprised if all of this content has now found its way into some music generation AI.
  • BLKNSLVR 1 hour ago
    Edited to add first: nice article covering an important couple of critical pieces of the Internet's history.

    Concerning the "Joy" element:

    Someone at my workplace started a Music League, with a select few music aficionados and hangers on joining, and it has been _the best_ team bonding exercise I've ever been involved with. We have covered a broad spectrum of topics that have challenged pretty much everyone at some point. Music League has a bunch of default Themes that range from boring to OK, so we've been coming up with our own suggestions, and over the course of about 12 months we've had some great ones - but it relies on the participants allowing themselves to be vulnerable when the occasion suits.

    This has provided joy amongst all participants in, I think, a similar way to the sharing / discovery of the golden age of music piracy. We even setup our own Slack channel un-affiliated with our workplace because a couple of people have left the company, but wanted to stay in the League.

    If I have time tonight, I'll list the Themes we've covered as a reply or edit of this comment.

    Concerning the "Music Piracy" element:

    I don't really pirate, unless it's some incredibly obscure thing that can only be found on slsk (are we allowed to even mention it's name?).

    I use a streaming service, but I also buy the really good shit from Bandcamp, since most streaming services are pretty scummy with their royalties back to artists, and I want them to keep doing what they're doing cough AdP cough.

    I also run my own instance of LMS[0] so my FLAC collection is always available to me wherever I am (which kinda feels like piracy, but the collection is almost all legit).

    MusicBrainz[1] is also doing god's work.

    King Gizzard and the Lizard Wizard took their discography off Spotify for ideological reasons, and I support their decision to follow their morality in doing so, but it does put me in a conundrum due to the phenomenal size of their catalogue. I've bought some, but definitely not all. Just gonna have to grind through it, although they seem to put new music out faster than my monthly purchase quota.

    [0]: https://github.com/epoupon/lms (cheers @epoupon, I'm pretty sure you're on HN)

    [1]: https://musicbrainz.org/

  • SkintMesh 1 hour ago
    Nicotine
  • self_awareness 1 hour ago
    It's not really about piracy in general, it's mostly about What.CD.

    Equivalent of what.cd today is RED.

    But, TBH, most of the pirated music today is on YouTube anyway.

    • daniel-smid 1 hour ago
      What.CD's real magic was the curation and lossless-everything culture, not just free files. Redacted keeps the archive going but that obsessive completeness is hard to rebuild.
  • yesbut 2 hours ago
    weird, I still love pirating music.
    • dxbednarczyk 1 hour ago
      Still very much alive! Just not as popular with the advent of $10/mo all-you-can-eat streaming services.
    • ocd 1 hour ago
      Hard to argue against it when you get memory holed by playlist entry removals by a cloud service. Much easier living having everything at `.config/mpd/playlists` with git history.
      • tonyhart7 13 minutes ago
        You couldnt be serious
    • konart 1 hour ago
      This. I do use Spotify, but this has nothing to do with my local music collection. Admittedly, mostly pirated.
      • silon42 1 hour ago
        I don't use Spotify, but I would consider it if I could download maybe 1 or 2 mp3 per month for offline use.
  • 0xbadcafebee 1 hour ago
    I wouldn't say the joy was the piracy.

    I remember when MySpace had this silly flash player that would stream MP3s from users' profiles. This was the main way to find indie and local bands' tracks, but every major artist had a profile too. Looking at the browser requests you could easily see the request format for downloading tracks listed on profiles. And what was worse, they all followed a standard enumerated naming convention, so you could literally download every track on MySpace by simple iteration. There was no rate limit, no cookies, nothing to stop it. The result was great: not only did you get the music you were interested in, you got a lot more you'd never heard of. And you could listen to it all on any device at any time; burn it to a CD, record to cassette tape, put it on a WinAmp playlist, whatever. For a kid with a hard time growing up, that music was an escape to a better world. The freedom to listen to what you wanted, when you wanted, how you wanted, felt like a gift deserved. You'd still go to their shows when you could, pay for albums when you could, but what kid has tons of free cash to spend?

    About a year later, the download method was so well known that MySpace changed to a multipart chunked streaming system and randomized the request IDs. It now required complex custom code to stream from their player alone. Access to your favorite local bands' music was now closed. The internet continued to birth to new ways to obtain music, so you could continue to get Nine Inch Nails and Infected Mushroom; but the local bands lost out on valuable word of mouth.

  • shevy-java 1 hour ago
    I don't call it piracy. I call it a human right. Besides, yt-dlp made music "piracy" irrelevant. But, even aside from this, I noticed that I rarely add new music locally. Right now I have 764 songs I collected over almost 30 years; while I may add new music I enjoy, I mostly just listen to semi-random music on youtube these days, just as background noise. So I don't quite have a strong use case, comparing this to the napster era.

    https://bash-org-archive.com/?104052

  • globular-toast 1 hour ago
    I can vouch for OiNK and What.cd being magical places, unlikely to ever come back. There was also Waffles which was a little more like OiNK in spirit, but What had a much bigger selection and discovery was second to none.

    The owner of OiNK did nothing wrong and was cleared in court, but the music industry was still able to hire thugs (the police) to raid his home in the early morning and ruin years of his life. He understandable went under the radar but I hope everything is ok now.

    I still think about the users of those sites to this day. The internet just isn't what it was any more.

  • klipen 1 hour ago
    Isnt REDacted the continuationnof What.cd
  • ktallett 1 hour ago
    I've tried all the streaming services, I've regularly bought physical copies of music even in recent years, but nothing has exposed me to such a wide range of music and such a range of artists as a well curated blogspot. Whether that be a wide range of excellent bootlegs or music that has not been moved from cassette to digital, it just provides me with so much more joy. Especially easy to do now iPods are back in vogue
  • alex1138 1 hour ago
    I'm so incredibly happy police resources are being used to "protect" the rest of us from... harm...?
    • Cthulhu_ 15 minutes ago
      Music piracy and copyright infringement are civil matters, the police is (...should not be?) involved.
    • BLKNSLVR 37 minutes ago
      I guess that's something else a bunch of us learned about the world from moving in those circles. Important life lessons provided by being at least adjacent to music piracy.
    • self_awareness 34 minutes ago
      Police exists to enforce the policy set by legislations.

      Legislations define rules to protect "us" from harm, but police is for policing only.

      They do not protect people. They protect the law.

      • alex1138 16 minutes ago
        I know. I'm just, allowed to be sad

        As far as I'm aware, the Pirate Bay raid essentially only happened because the US threatened Sweden with trade repercussions. Like, thanks, guys? Way to show you have superior ethics to the pirates

  • charcircuit 1 hour ago
    Any amount of joy you lost is a fraction of joy lost from people blatantly stealing the fruits of other people's's labor. Communities do not have to be parasites to exist. Similar amounts of joy could be created over a different interest that didn't require stealing and hurting others.
    • BLKNSLVR 1 hour ago
      The article touches on the topic and mentions Nine Inch Nails' and Radiohead's 'free' album releases.

      There's also the possibility/likelihood (I can't recall the results of the research) that increasing exposure, via piracy, is actually better for the artist long term.

      And then, as others have already responded, the worst offenders are, generally, the industry insiders themselves. Reports of the death of music are greatly exaggerated. Reports of the death of the music industry are widely looked forward to.

      I pirated plenty as a kid with no money, it was cheap and it was easy - does anyone here remember high-speed dubbing? I also recorded a _lot_ of music off the radio. On the rare occasion I bough an album I made sure it was worth being the only thing I listen to for weeks - and the only way to know that is to have prior knowledge. I buy plenty as an adult with a music budget. I believe that's how it should be.

      • charcircuit 6 minutes ago
        >increasing exposure, via piracy, is actually better for the artist long term.

        If breaking someone's kneecaps extended their life by 20 years I wouldn't want someone to randomly break my kneecaps and feel good about it because they "did me a favor."

        >I pirated plenty as a kid with no money

        Neither age nor wealth exempts someone's stealing from being a crime. In fact I see it as worse crime as it sets a bad example that may be hard to change later.

    • sandcat_ 1 hour ago
      Hey now, that’s a bit of a harsh way to talk about record labels. Sure most of the money you pay goes to the top performers, no matter what you actually listen to, but that doesn’t make them parasites. Executives have to eat too.
    • ktallett 1 hour ago
      Is it stealing if when I buy digital I don't own it?
      • BLKNSLVR 36 minutes ago
        You have stolen a temporary license!
      • charcircuit 20 minutes ago
        You own a license when you buy it digitally. Stealing is never okay regardless of if something is technically buying or not.
    • b345 1 hour ago
      Funny because that is exactly how capitalism works.
    • lubujackson 1 hour ago
      [dead]
  • jocelyner 30 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • flipped 1 hour ago
    Did everyone forget about soulseek? It's still very much alive, been using it for years.
    • fawnwind 1 hour ago
      I still use it, easiest way to download music these days.
    • ZlibraryKO 34 minutes ago
      Soulseek is great still use it regularly.
    • bayesianbot 56 minutes ago
      And imo slskd is fantastic client for soulseek, I just found it few weeks back
  • SamuraiLion 1 hour ago
    [flagged]
  • stavros 1 hour ago
    I can't believe the operators of what.cd would choose to delete everything without at least a warning, or letting people back it up. So much music and metadata just lost!

    Not to mention the crime of law enforcement prioritising private profit over a cultural milestone. It really is like they burned the library of Alexandria because it hadn't paid the copyright fee.

    • dewey 20 minutes ago
      There was an official release that contained just that and a lot of other things like image assets uploaded on Archive.org. You can’t just put a database dump online without doing a lot of cleaning first.

      There’s some websites where people made that browsable too so you can go through collages and album and artist pages with the original style sheets too. Just no forums or torrent files or images.

    • thrtythreeforty 1 hour ago
      I refuse to believe there's not a database backup somewhere. Such careful curators would surely hate to destroy it!
    • little-victory 4 minutes ago
      [flagged]