6 comments

  • twalla 52 minutes ago
  • 8by3 2 hours ago
    Any site that requires an account just to read users freely created public content should be boycotted.
    • noir_lord 1 hour ago
      Way ahead of you, reddit links are on my "nah, mostly can't be bothered" list since they made that change.

      Maintained for years that as soon as they disable old.reddit.com (or make it effectively disabled) I'd abandon the site and well it appears they finally crossed that rubicon.

      It's a shame, reddit was pretty great at one point and it's been a slow descent ever since - another useful part of the internet (to me) dies and in part thanks to AI - seems to be a pattern that one.

  • stefanos82 31 minutes ago
    Just use your browser's devtools to edit the link by replacing `old` to `www` and it should now work.
  • bravetraveler 1 hour ago
    Be brave, drop the LLMs. Make them put you on a PIP for doing your work without the chatbot.

    I assume this is astroturfing.

  • cedws 1 hour ago
    Any archive link? Can’t view it on mobile without logging in.
  • RGS1811 1 hour ago
    This is low confidence prediction, but IMO this person’s org is setting itself up for disaster. Who is accountable for all the slop they’re shipping if nobody even knows what it does anymore?

    Related: https://elliotmilco.substack.com/p/who-is-accountable-when-n...

    • noir_lord 1 hour ago
      > Who is accountable for all the slop they’re shipping if nobody even knows what it does anymore?

      Whoever management in the future decides is accountable and weirdly... it's seldom them.