10 comments

  • water-data-dude 34 minutes ago
    I feel like setting up cameras pointed at the houses of influential people with public web feeds might help push some privacy reform.
    • frollogaston 25 minutes ago
      Or make all the Flock feeds public. Presently I have to assume all of these can and will be hacked by someone, or abused at a mass scale, so better not put them anywhere that could be a problem.
  • darrylb42 2 hours ago
    I don't really understand how blurring out a house adds privacy. Looking around my neighborhood on Google street view I sometimes find houses that are blurred, now that otherwise normal looking house is now suspicious. Because I am physically close I can just look at the house if I wanted to. Someone "special" lives there.
    • schiffern 1 hour ago
      I'm confused. If he has nothing to hide he has nothing to fear, right?

      Seems like some Good Samaritan should set up a mobile pole camera (or twelve) outside his house 24/7. Rest easy, it's all being done for his own safety!

      • jordanb 1 hour ago
        The guy gives me unhinged stalker vibes whenever he does an interview.
    • NewJazz 1 hour ago
      now that otherwise normal looking house is now suspicious

      Mysterious? Yes. Suspicious? I wouldn't think that. Plenty of houses in my neighborhood are blurred. I don't think much about it. And yes, I can just walk over and look. But I'm their neighbor. Not someone megameters away...

    • frollogaston 1 hour ago
      You only know what the front of the house looks like.
      • ascorbic 1 hour ago
        So does Street View
        • frollogaston 1 hour ago
          Oh, turns out you can't blur the satellite images. Then yeah idk how this helps.

          Edit: Well maybe you aren't a target to begin with, but mass scanning can make you one. Like if you park some expensive car out front and someone far away checks all houses with expensive cars. It's a bit far-fetched, but there also aren't that many reasons not to blur your house unless the concern is they only target blurred houses.

  • bastawhiz 1 hour ago
    Didn't this man just go on record saying the public needs to "compromise" on privacy?
  • jasonriddle 30 minutes ago
  • higginsniggins 1 hour ago
    Flock ceo attempts to stop people using online photo system from stocking him…

    Hmmmm…

  • xvxvx 2 hours ago
    Tells you all you need to know about Flock.
  • Freedom2 47 minutes ago
    As someone who may or may not have a Flock (YC 2017) watching me as I type this, I'm glad that it exists. I can now feel "Flock Safe and Secure™", knowing that the compromise I've made has been worth it.
  • deepc4life 2 hours ago
    I'd hope he did! I hope all of you do to. This isn't information you want so easily publicly available. It's a pretty easy request.
    • cheese_van 1 hour ago
      It is an easy request. When the announcement blurring was made available, I made the request just to see if it they would do it - and they did!

      Now, if anyone in the neighborhood asks me, "Why is your house blurred?" I reply, "Why are you asking? Is anyone asking questions about me? What did they look like?" (well, that's what I plan on replying if anyone asks)

    • frollogaston 1 hour ago
      Yeah seeing this article was the reminder I needed to blur mine rn.
    • lorecore 2 hours ago
      And yet there’s no way to get yourself blurred in Flock videos.
      • jordanb 1 hour ago
        The first key feature of the Panopticon is that the guards can observe the inmate at all times and he can't hide.

        The second key feature is that the inmate can't observe the guards. He can't know who they are and can't even know if they're paying attention to him or not.

      • uberman 2 hours ago
        Yes, an here in lies the hypocrisy of our times where tech titans can have their information removed from public data sources (anyone remember the guy tracking Musk's plane?) while amassing staggering quantities of data about everyone else. Then have the gall to call for a "compromise" on their collection and selling of this data and our privacy.
  • thrownaway561 1 hour ago
    People are so childish nowadays. The fact that things escalate to the point.
    • Micrococonut 1 hour ago
      Indeed. This mass surveillance should have been stopped long ago.
    • newspaper1 1 hour ago
      The Flock CEO just this week told the US public that it needs to "compromise" on their right to privacy. I'm glad things are escalating, we need every single one of these cameras taken down.