What's Earth's dominant species by mass?

(signoregalilei.com)

68 points | by surprisetalk 8 hours ago

12 comments

  • niccl 8 minutes ago
    In some book by P G Wodehouse (inventor of Jeeves the butler), one character says (out of nowhere) that all the humans on the planet could fit in a cubic hole 1/2 mile on each side. It took me a little while to convince myself that was true. It still is, apparently
  • ortusdux 1 hour ago
    Facts I try not to think about:

    - More than 2/3rds of the world's avian biomass is poultry

    - There are more Panda Expresses than pandas

    • sidewndr46 32 minutes ago
      Aren't there more just about any retail store than pandas?
      • hex4def6 4 minutes ago
        Looks like there's about 2,500 pandas in the world.

        https://www.franchisetimes.com/top-400-2026/

        Pandas could fit in the top 20, beating out Panera bread (2,225).

      • anukin 6 minutes ago
        How does

        “There are more jiffy’s lubes than pandas in the world “

        sound?

        • komodo99 4 minutes ago
          Slippery.

          Now I want to give a panda a slip-n-slide and film it.

  • vlyan 12 minutes ago
    >There are thousands of species of ants and termites, and just one species of human.

    that's rather debatable. unless, of course, you're an adherent of creationism.

    • pfdietz 9 minutes ago
      It's talking about species that currently exist. As far as we know there is only one currently existing species in the genus Homo.
  • imzadi 19 minutes ago
    I feel like it might be bamboo, but they sort of skipped over grasses
    • yorwba 4 minutes ago
      Grasses mentioned in the article: rice, wheat, maize and sugar cane. I think all of them likely beat the bamboos because there are too many different bamboo species, not a single dominant one.
  • gumby 47 minutes ago
    Famously, when asked about a god, J.B.S. Haldane allegedly said that if there is a god or gods, they must have an “inordinate fondness for beetles.”
    • adammarples 15 minutes ago
      This is because when they would lay a sheet on the ground and shake the branches of a tree, they would often find more species of beetles than anything else. However, they may have been extrapolating a bit far from the few places they tried this.
  • a3w 19 minutes ago
    How come algae did not make the list?
  • gkoenig 8 hours ago
    It was fun and gave human written. Thanks for that!
    • elevation 36 minutes ago
      English words like "goodbye" are contracted from longer expressions after centuries of common use[0]. Reading your phrase "gave human written" made me wonder how this phrase would contract if it were still in use centuries from today.

      [0]: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/t2ew2UHaCuY

    • apsurd 36 minutes ago
      funny that i didn’t think about it till i read your comment. and then realized i read the entire thing. checks out.

      on the other hand i don’t think I’m physically capable of reading the AI landing pages of every new product on HN.

  • nubinetwork 2 hours ago
    Was surprised not to see whales on the list
  • andai 1 hour ago
    Obligatory xkcd has a nice visualization of the land mammals by mass:

    https://xkcd.com/1338/

  • liquid-monthly 3 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • JoeAltmaier 6 hours ago
    Anaerobic bacteria in rock underground. Because they inhabit cubic volume, not 2D surfaces, there can be no comparison.
    • xboxnolifes 1 hour ago
      I'm not sure what cubic volume vs 2D surfaces means to you, but these comparisons are by mass, not volume. Plus, anaerobic bacteria would only come up on top if you counted all of them as one species, which they are not.
      • QuadmasterXLII 25 minutes ago
        Pretty much all life is 1 g / ml give or take 20%
  • lukeify 59 minutes ago
    Plastic?
    • imzadi 21 minutes ago
      Plastic is a species?